All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts 1 and 3 of the superseding indictment are multiplicitous and requests the court to dismiss one of the counts. The government is accused of overcharging and potentially prejudicing the jury.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
6
Jurisdiction
—
Case
210
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the indictment is multiplicitous and prejudicial, and requests the court to require the government to elect which conspiracy charge to prosecute.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the indictment is multiplicitous and prejudicial, and requests the court to require the government to elect which conspiracy charge to prosecute.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.