All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The defense argues that despite the government's claims of having strong evidence backed by contemporaneous documents, the discovery materials produced so far lack meaningful documentary corroboration of the allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell. The majority of the documents relate to a later time period than the charged conspiracy.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
1
Jurisdiction
—
Case
20-cr-330 (AJN) Document 192-2 Filed 08/24/20 Page 36 of 95
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (defendant): This document is potentially important because it challenges the government's representations about the strength of their case against Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting that the discovery materials do not contain meaningful corroboration of the allegations.
Jeffrey Epstein (alleged co-conspirator): This document is potentially important because it challenges the government's representations about the strength of their case against Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting that the discovery materials do not contain meaningful corroboration of the allegations.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.