All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein applies to her as a co-conspirator and that the government's interpretation of the agreement is incorrect. The memorandum contends that the plain language of the NPA provides immunity to co-conspirators, including Maxwell, and that the government's attempt to add limitations not present in the text is unfounded.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
23
Jurisdiction
—
Case
223
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that the superseding indictment against her should be dismissed due to the government's alleged breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement made with Jeffrey Epstein.
Jeffrey Epstein (Individual with whom the NPA was made): This document is significant because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that the superseding indictment against her should be dismissed due to the government's alleged breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement made with Jeffrey Epstein.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.