ReportUnredacted

Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a reply memorandum arguing that the superseding indictment should be dismissed due to a Sixth Amendment violation, as the White Plains grand jury pool underrepresented Black and Hispanic jurors compared to the Manhattan Counties or the Southern District of New York. The government conceded that Black and Hispanic jurors are 'distinctive' groups and that their underrepresentation is significant.

Source

DOJ

Release Date

—

Pages

Jurisdiction

—

Case

211

Named Individuals in This Document

4 individuals identified

Ghislaine MaxwellCONVICTEDBritish socialite; Epstein associate

1 mentions

Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the superseding indictment should be dismissed due to a violation of Ghislaine Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community, specifically challenging the composition of the

CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELLNAMED IN DOCUMENTSAssociate

1 mentions

Christian R. Everdell (Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the superseding indictment should be dismissed due to a violation of Ghislaine Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a grand jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community, specifically challenging the composition of the

Full-Text Search — Phase 2

In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.