All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a subpoena, arguing that it is an improper attempt to obtain discovery beyond what is required under Rule 16 and Brady. The law firm contends that Maxwell's requests lack specificity as required by United States v. Nixon.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
17
Jurisdiction
—
Case
247
1 individual identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it reveals a dispute between Ghislaine Maxwell and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP regarding a Rule 17(c) subpoena and highlights the specificity requirements for subpoenas in criminal cases.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.