All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The reply memorandum argues that Counts 5 and 6 (perjury charges) are improperly joined with Counts 1-4 (Mann Act charges) in the superseding indictment and should be severed for a separate trial. The defendant contends that the joinder is improper due to the lack of a logical connection between the counts and the potential for prejudicial evidence.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
17
Jurisdiction
—
Case
224
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant as it presents the defendant's argument for severing two perjury counts from the rest of the charges in the superseding indictment, potentially impacting the trial's outcome.
Jeffrey Epstein (Associated individual mentioned in the case): This document is significant as it presents the defendant's argument for severing two perjury counts from the rest of the charges in the superseding indictment, potentially impacting the trial's outcome.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.