All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The memorandum argues that the government's use of a White Plains Division grand jury to indict Ghislaine Maxwell was unconstitutional because it did not represent a fair cross-section of the community where the alleged crimes took place. The document highlights that the Manhattan Division grand jury was available but not used, and that the White Plains Division jury pool underrepresented Black and Hispanic residents.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
13
Jurisdiction
—
Case
126
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is potentially important because it challenges the indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell on constitutional grounds, arguing that the use of a White Plains Division grand jury violated her Sixth Amendment rights.
Jeffrey Epstein (Associated individual mentioned in the indictment): This document is potentially important because it challenges the indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell on constitutional grounds, arguing that the use of a White Plains Division grand jury violated her Sixth Amendment rights.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.