All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The defense and the court agree that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment is moot due to the return of a new S2 superseding indictment by a Manhattan grand jury. The court denies the motion as moot. The document is a letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
1
Jurisdiction
—
Case
22285
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant as it shows the court's ruling on a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment and highlights the procedural developments in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Christian R. Everdell (Defense Attorney): This document is significant as it shows the court's ruling on a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment and highlights the procedural developments in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.