All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The memorandum of law supports Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment, arguing that her alleged misstatements in a civil deposition were not perjurious and lacked materiality. The document provides a detailed analysis of the legal authority and factual background related to the case. It contends that the questions asked in the deposition were poorly worded and Maxwell's responses were literally truthful.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
26
Jurisdiction
—
Case
136
3 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it presents a legal argument for dismissing two counts of perjury against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her statements were not perjurious as a matter of law.
Jeffrey Epstein (Associated individual mentioned throughout the document): This document is significant because it presents a legal argument for dismissing two counts of perjury against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her statements were not perjurious as a matter of law.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.
Virginia Giuffre (Plaintiff in the underlying civil defamation action): This document is significant because it presents a legal argument for dismissing two counts of perjury against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing that her statements were not perjurious as a matter of law.