All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The memorandum of law argues that the pre-indictment delay has prejudiced Ghislaine Maxwell's ability to defend herself, citing lost witnesses, corrupted memories, and tactical delay by the government. The document presents a detailed analysis of the applicable law and the specific circumstances of the case. It contends that the government's delay was reckless and in bad faith, further supporting Maxwell's motion to dismiss the indictment.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
26
Jurisdiction
—
Case
138
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is potentially important because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's argument for dismissing counts one through six of the superseding indictment due to pre-indictment delay, which she claims has caused her prejudice.
Jeffrey Epstein (Deceased individual whose testimony is relevant to the case): This document is potentially important because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's argument for dismissing counts one through six of the superseding indictment due to pre-indictment delay, which she claims has caused her prejudice.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.