All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
Ghislaine Maxwell's reply memorandum argues that Counts One through Four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred. The memorandum contests the retroactive application of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 and asserts that the charged offenses do not fall under the statute's provisions.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
22
Jurisdiction
—
Case
206
4 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, as it presents her legal arguments for dismissing certain counts of the indictment based on statute of limitations grounds. The ruling on this motion could significantly impact the scope of the trial.
Christian R. Everdell (Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, as it presents her legal arguments for dismissing certain counts of the indictment based on statute of limitations grounds. The ruling on this motion could significantly impact the scope of the trial.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca (Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, as it presents her legal arguments for dismissing certain counts of the indictment based on statute of limitations grounds. The ruling on this motion could significantly impact the scope of the trial.
Bobbi C. Sternheim (Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is a crucial court filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, as it presents her legal arguments for dismissing certain counts of the indictment based on statute of limitations grounds. The ruling on this motion could significantly impact the scope of the trial.