All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The defense requests a trial continuance due to the government's filing of a superseding indictment that added new charges and expanded the time period of the alleged conduct. The defense argues that it needs more time to investigate and prepare for the new charges, citing the significant amount of new discovery material and the difficulties in reviewing it.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
8
Jurisdiction
—
Case
202
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument for a trial continuance due to the government's late filing of a superseding indictment, which added new charges and expanded the scope of the case.
Bobbi C. Sternheim (Defense Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument for a trial continuance due to the government's late filing of a superseding indictment, which added new charges and expanded the scope of the case.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.