All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The defense responds to the government's letter regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence, arguing that the government's assurances are insufficient to safeguard Maxwell's constitutional rights and that the court should resolve the motions before trial.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
5
Jurisdiction
—
Case
243
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the government's conduct may have violated Ghislaine Maxwell's constitutional rights and that the court should resolve her motions to suppress evidence before trial.
Haddon Morgan Foreman (Defense Attorney): This document is significant because it reveals the defense's argument that the government's conduct may have violated Ghislaine Maxwell's constitutional rights and that the court should resolve her motions to suppress evidence before trial.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.