All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The memorandum argues that the NPA between Ghislaine Maxwell and the DOJ prohibits the prosecution of potential co-conspirators, including Maxwell, and that the superseding indictment breaches this agreement. It also requests discovery and an evidentiary hearing if the court does not dismiss the indictment.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
42
Jurisdiction
—
Case
142
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that the superseding indictment should be dismissed due to the government's breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
Jeffrey Epstein (Co-conspirator mentioned in the NPA and indictment): This document is significant because it presents Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that the superseding indictment should be dismissed due to the government's breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.