All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions to reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy interests, which the court ultimately grants. The court also orders the parties to propose redactions or file Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6 on the public docket.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
4
Jurisdiction
—
Case
232
5 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant in the case): This document is significant because it reveals the government's efforts to balance the need for transparency in court proceedings with the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims in a high-profile case.
Alison Moe (Assistant United States Attorney): This document is significant because it reveals the government's efforts to balance the need for transparency in court proceedings with the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims in a high-profile case.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.
Maurene Comey (Assistant United States Attorney): This document is significant because it reveals the government's efforts to balance the need for transparency in court proceedings with the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims in a high-profile case.
Andrew Rohrbach (Assistant United States Attorney): This document is significant because it reveals the government's efforts to balance the need for transparency in court proceedings with the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims in a high-profile case.
Audrey Strauss (United States Attorney): This document is significant because it reveals the government's efforts to balance the need for transparency in court proceedings with the need to protect the privacy interests of third parties and alleged victims in a high-profile case.