All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
2
Jurisdiction
—
Case
128
5 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant as it reveals the government's position on the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions and highlights the balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information in a high-profile case.
Alison Moe (Assistant United States Attorney): This document is significant as it reveals the government's position on the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions and highlights the balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information in a high-profile case.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.
Maurene Comey (Assistant United States Attorney): This document is significant as it reveals the government's position on the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions and highlights the balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information in a high-profile case.
Andrew Rohrbach (Assistant United States Attorney): This document is significant as it reveals the government's position on the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions and highlights the balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information in a high-profile case.
Audrey Strauss (United States Attorney): This document is significant as it reveals the government's position on the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions and highlights the balance between transparency and protecting sensitive information in a high-profile case.