All data sourced from public U.S. government records. Appearance of any name does NOT imply guilt or wrongdoing. Full disclaimer →
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell informs the court that the defense agrees that the motion to dismiss the S1 superseding indictment is moot due to the return of the S2 superseding indictment by a grand jury in Manhattan. The letter is in response to the court's Opinion and Order dated April 16, 2021. The case is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
Source
DOJ
Release Date
—
Pages
1
Jurisdiction
—
Case
225
2 individuals identified
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant): This document is significant because it shows the defense's agreement that a motion to dismiss the indictment is moot due to a superseding indictment being returned by a different grand jury.
Christian R. Everdell (Defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell): This document is significant because it shows the defense's agreement that a motion to dismiss the indictment is moot due to a superseding indictment being returned by a different grand jury.
Full-Text Search — Phase 2
In-document keyword search is coming when OCR/text ingestion is complete.